An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The above statement make the argument that in order to combat the vitamin A deficiency present in the people of Tagus, the government should encourage the production of a new breed of millet that is rich in vitamin A. As it stands, the rigor of the given statement is weak because it fails to provide crucial information that can help elucidate or strengthen the presented argument.
First of all, the statement needs to provide data on the prevalence and distribution of vitamin A deficiency in Tagus. It may be that only a small percentage of the population is affected by vitamin A deficiency, ...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-09-30 | apurva | 52 | view |
| 2013-09-22 | rubyho | 40 | view |
| 2013-08-02 | natasha_vinod | 40 | view |
| 2013-07-15 | smartaquarius10 | 37 | view |
| 2013-07-15 | zen123 | 68 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. (I have presented the following essay 77
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 88
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 87
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permi 81
Sentence: The above statement make the argument that in order to combat the vitamin A deficiency present in the people of Tagus, the government should encourage the production of a new breed of millet that is rich in vitamin A. As it stands, the rigor of the given statement is weak because it fails to provide crucial information that can help elucidate or strengthen the presented argument.
Description: The fragment statement make the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace make with verb, past tense
Sentence: Furthermore, we need to provided with information on why the proposed method of solving vitamin A deficiency is the best in comparison to other alternatives.
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to to and provided
Sentence: Overall, the argument posited in the above statement can be improved if the author provides us with a detailed set of information that address all the aspects of adopting the new millet type and the efficacy of this measure in comparison with alternative ways of solving the issue of vitamin deficiency.
Description: The fragment that address all is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace address with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 553 350
No. of Characters: 2565 1500
No. of Different Words: 203 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.849 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.638 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.777 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 173 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 141 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 99 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.722 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.551 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.411 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.665 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.282 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5