First, this is a cross time, cross location and cross interest research analysis, any comparative study should be taken with a grain of salt. convincing and matches with the nowadays’ popular ovation “Go-Green”. At the first sight to the above letter, you will agree with the author that authorities should prohibit and ban the building of a road along the edge of Wetlands. However, as we go deep into the matter, we can easily grasp many flaws and realize that the argument lacks the vital evidences to validate its claim.
It was a different time from now, technology may improved drastically, nowadays road will have different environmental impact. , while the tufted groundhog lives in the ground. Thus, when Carpenteria allowed the revoke of the sanctuary, it might be that people started to build factories and houses across the sea and water became polluted and no longer livable. These possibilities may be the reason for the decline of the sea otter. On the other hand, groundhogs live on the ground and won’t be affected by such changes at the coastal areas. As long as we can’t confirm these claims, we need enough info about both creatures and their habitat to determine whether road development should be allowed or not.
It was a totally different species, sea otter lives differently to groundhog. A sea otter has different mode of life and they have to crawl a long the upper surface to relocate, unlike groundhogs using 3-dimentional tunnels. , which led to the decrease in sea otter. He didn’t mention any exact reason for that decline. Is it due to climate change? Or due to people’s bad behavior and hunting of sea otter? Or is it just a coincidence? He should’ve mentioned proper reasons to avoid ambiguity.
Different location matters, in another town, everything can be different, from the flow of traffic to animal behaviors. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. And there’s no enough data about the current status and numbers of groundhogs. Maybe groundhogs have become extinct before 2014 so West Lansburg was declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004. Thus, there’s no particular basis upon which road establishment should be prohibited.
In conclusion, we can say author should provide the exact reason and statistics of Eastern region's declination.If those two parts have different issues with sea population,then providing a same conclusion,will never give success.Also sea population's behavioral changes should be counted to make a decision on whether sea side road is harmful or not.
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a manufacturing company."During the past year, workers at our newly opened factory reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries. Panoply produces products 66
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager: "One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow 38
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books. We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because 33
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another. 70
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Convincing
... should be taken with a grain of salt. convincing and matches with the nowadays' pop...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ll have different environmental impact. , while the tufted groundhog lives in the...
^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... ground. Thus, when Carpenteria allowed the revoke of the sanctuary, it might be that peop...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...groundhogs using 3-dimentional tunnels. , which led to the decrease in sea otter....
^^
Line 11, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... exact reason and statistics of Eastern regions declination.If those two parts have dif...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...atistics of Eastern regions declination.If those two parts have different issues w...
^^
Line 11, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...ave different issues with sea population,then providing a same conclusion,will never ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , will
...ulation,then providing a same conclusion,will never give success.Also sea populations...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...same conclusion,will never give success.Also sea populations behavioral changes shou...
^^^^
Line 11, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...same conclusion,will never give success.Also sea populations behavioral changes shou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27511961722 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05528333151 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593301435407 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.9471054681 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174963210683 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613956272865 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100179384327 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966684966045 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841609528605 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.