People emphasizing government to buld an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding cities. Do you agree or disgree with this statement?
around the world, people and government are discussing the idea for the transport future in different countries, one could be to build a news road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities or for creating and advances transport and technology system. Both ideas have followers. However, in this essay, I going to mention my perspective support in my experience as a person to take public transport every single day.
In big cities, public transport has trams, trains subways, buses, taxis and Uber and all these systems work together to keep up the city clear and transport people around the city and suburbs. During the day, there are congestions hours where sometimes this system will be collapse and public transport won't be enough to offer a punctual service for the community. In this case, cities like Melbourne and Sydney in Australia need to have a better transport system to support the new demand. In the new era, society is asking for transport system more efficient, with new technologies and more comfortable, where people think twice to take their own car. For example, now the world is discussing to build a friendly transport system where respect the ecosystem and the planet.
if the government just discuss the idea to build new roads, the planet will be suffering more pollution and our future maybe won't have more opportunities to create more systems. Actually, the government does not need to create technologies or different transport systems, just with the simple idea to encourage people to use a bicycle will be big progress. For example, Holland is one of the first country in the world where more people use the bicycle how a way to go to work, study, shopping...etc.
To conclude is important to keep discussing how to create a new transport system in the world even if we new to build new roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-10 | viviana | 72 | view |
| 2018-06-05 | mojtaba1980 | 85 | view |
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 65
- Company top management should take in account employees’ suggestions or ideas in their decision-making. Discuss. 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believe that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform. Choose which position you most ag 70
- In Some Countries around the world, Voting Is Compulsory. Do You Agree With The Notion Of Compulsory Voting? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Around
around the world, people and government are di...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...have followers. However, in this essay, I going to mention my perspective support...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...espect the ecosystem and the planet. if the government just discuss the idea to...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: I_NEW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'knew' (past of "to know")?
Suggestion: knew
...ransport system in the world even if we new to build new roads.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94193548387 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68103913878 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496774193548 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8054587428 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276979864887 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107338724577 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713158139815 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177833818803 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615939002982 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.