The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the generation amount of electricity from various fuel resources in two countries between 1980 and 2000.
It can be clearly seen that the generated units were also increased in australia and france whereas the importance of natural gas was decreased. Overall, one interesting fact was that the development of nuclear power was only applied in france.
In 1980, the total electricity generation from two countries was almost at 100 and 90 units for australia and france, where the largest component came from coal at 50 and 25 units independently. The significance of natural gas was same vital as coal in france while the contribution was lower with hydro power at 20 units in australia. As far as the least generation in australia and france, there were oil and hydro power at 10 and 5 units separately.
Over 20 years, the distribution of total production changed dramatically. As for total production, the generation in australia rose to 170 units as well as an increase was realized in france by 90 units. coal generation was still the biggest, which raised to 130 units sharply, although produced units remained unchanged in france. also, the generated hydro power was increased to 36 units in australia despite there was just 2 units produced with natural gas in france. Moreover, nuclear power became the most popular in france at 126 units suddenly. Lastly, oil and coal were fell to 2 units individually, as if the least in australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-10 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | cocococo123 | 67 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls In the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coal
...ase was realized in france by 90 units. coal generation was still the biggest, which...
^^^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ced units remained unchanged in france. also, the generated hydro power was increase...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idually, as if the least in australia.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00406504065 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84467176419 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2467698641 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.583333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247964957063 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1043029055 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621756264016 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172796940365 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070667927505 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.