There is ongoing debate over necessity of young generation having a cellphone. Many parents believe that it could be beneficial for their hairs to have it from the early age, while others have opposite opinion regarding this matter. This essay will examine two views and will prove that it is important to equip the child with the phone.
On the one hand, mobile phones always destruct children from studying. With the rapid advance of technology, modern smart phones are not only the tool for contacting with others though the distance, it is literally a compact computer. It can perform varied functions, like internet operating, working with documents and playing games. The last criteria is highly recognized by youngsters, what is more, most of those games are extremely addictive. For example, most of the teachers around the world, complain a lot about pupils' discipline in the classes, namely, they do not hesitate to play on their phone during the lectures. Consequently, it effects students' academic progress and lead to the low scores. Generally, having a mobile phone has a negative impact on educational success of the children at school.
On the other hand, such trend has its benefit, like constant connection between parents and their child. Modern cities are densely populated and it is easy to get lost on the streets. Therefore, it is crucial for a young person to have his phone in a pocket, wherever he is, so the relatives can check on him at any time. Furthermore, in many educational institutions teachers, before the lessons, ask their students to put the phones on a silent mode and to leave it by the desk. Thus, the pupils do not have a temptation to play a game and focus more on studying. Obviously, cell phones are essential in terms controlling the child though the distance.
Considering everything, although, the mobile phone can be destructive for the child, it is an important device, which every young individual should have, in terms of safety reasons.
- You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time. Write a letter to the editor. In your letter:Say which edition and when did the article appearExplain why you lost contact with your f 78
- Sugar consumption is too harmful. Some people say it is government's responsibility to limitate sugar intake while others say it is individuals who are responsible.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot now not join him. You've found another friend who can go instead of you.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:Explain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead o 78
- Your office building doesn't have parking available. Write a letter to the manager. In your letter:Explain the problemSuggest a solutionSay why parking will benefit all employees 81
- Your child is going on a three day school trip to another country. The head teacher wants to find parents to go with the group and you would like to go.Write a letter to the head teacher. In your letter:•Say why you would like to go on the trip•Sugges 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01201201201 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67885710229 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591591591592 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.698245812 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1764705882 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126926148996 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397162086964 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420860584274 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794611426837 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216138101352 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.