the line graph shows thefts per thounsand vehicles in 4 european countries between 1990 and 1999

Essay topics:

the line graph shows thefts per thounsand vehicles in 4 european countries between 1990 and 1999

The graph depicts the figure for car thefts in four separate countries in Europe from 1990 to 1999
Overall, it can be clearly seen that registered the highest number of thefts in the group of European nations whilst the highest number recorded was between 1996 and 1997.
Looking at the line chart, there was an upward trend in the number of car thefts in Sweden from 1990 to 1993. By contrast, this figure for France and Canada declined steadily at about 7000 and 5000 thefts respectively in the year 1993. Besides that, this pattern in Great Britain fluctuated in the period of 3 years.
In details, in the next 3 years the proportion of car thefts in Great Britain increased significantly by 2000 thefts from 1994 to 1996. The trend in Sweden mirrored the trend in Britain but with a smaller number at this time. Meanwhile, this figure for France and Canada remained stable. In the last 3 years, there was a sharp decrease in the number of thefts in Britain and France while Sweden car thefts rose to nearly 15000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-25 Daisy Ho 78 view
2023-09-06 Lee Daisy view
2023-09-03 Lee Daisy view
2023-03-07 datdatduy1 84 view
2023-03-07 datdatduy1 78 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65745856354 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29692104362 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519337016575 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.492639015 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176217869235 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692789592032 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767385866925 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128667204775 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723641656266 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.