Rising University fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chance of employment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Students spend a great deal of time and money on tertiary study, therefore, vocational subjects would be a better investment in terms of immediate job opportunities. However, not everyone has a aptitude for science, engineering or medicine, and there is a need for graduates with ability gain from arts courses.
In subject such as philosophy, students learn a valuable set of skills. They become active thinkers who learn how to solve problem, not passive learners who memories facts and other people's Ideas. Philosophy students become proficient at critical and moral thinking, argumentation and debate. The ability to check and analyse topical issues or challenge the things as they are is very important. After all, someone needs to question the result or indeed the usefulness of scientific research, the politician's assertions, and historical event and assumptions is general. what is more, scandals in business and government emphasize the need for ethics in corporate and public domain.
The science and business are clearly very important for our community, and those who have a talent should, of course, pursue a university degree and a career in in those fields. If, however, they also have training in logic and analytical thinking or a board general knowledge from studying are subjects, they are more likely to be able to solve problems, create initiatives, find bias and avoid major pitfalls as they progress through their careers.
In short, I wholeheartedly disagree with the statement that are subject should not be tough. I suggest that every student should have instruction in philosophy, history or other arts subject, even if they pick to major in the science s, because learning critical thinking skills, and developing a wide background knowledge, will benefit them enormously in later life. In addition to this general training, we need specialist graduates in arts subjects to make their contribution to well-rounded society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | vaishali saral | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online. 61
- Some people prefer to Shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online. 67
- Some people prefer to Shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online. 61
- Stress related illness are becoming increasingly common.What do you think are the cause of this?What solution can you suggest? 61
- people sleep less than they used to in the past.what do you think is the reason behind this?what are the effects on them? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...pportunities. However, not everyone has a aptitude for science, engineering or me...
^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...rical event and assumptions is general. what is more, scandals in business and gover...
^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...pursue a university degree and a career in in those fields. If, however, they also ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, after all, in addition, in short, of course, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36688311688 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8919277881 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4622605137 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.153846154 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11996332721 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370717162893 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380701293012 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706875425401 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305014342225 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.