Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
It is often true that corporations mainly engage in activities that increase company's market value and aids the company. But that is not the only responsibilty that corporations have to take care of except the government law. Promoting the wellbeing of the society, its people and the environment in which the corporation resides also plays an major role in company's evolution in future.
Any corporation, say, on a big or small scale needs to have some way of bolstering and promoting the thoughts emerging around them. This benefits the corporation by not only having its fellow employees trust but also all the entities related to the corporation. For example, who would not like to join a company which promotes LGBTQIA community in society or a company which supports women empowerment? People love to work for such corporates which is there for them and in turn work dilligently for wellbeing of the company.
Another responsibility that corporates should take into consideration is that they work with a thought of conservating environment. Corporates should spread awareness internally as well as externally to make maximum use of eco-friendly or bio-degradeable equipments. Focusing on increasing the wealth of the corporate, they should also keep a track on environmental waste produced by them and aim to minimize it along the run. Promoting ideas like car pooling for work or by indulging activities such as making minimalistic use of electricity (by making use of central air conditioners instead of a personal one) not only helps corporate reduce environmental harm but also saves money which tends to betterment of the corporation itself.
To conclude, corporations should perform activities along with making as much money as possible that promote wellbeing of the society and environment in which they operate. Incorporating such policies into company should be considered as a pithy responisibilty of the corporate for the success of the firm and betterment of the world around them.
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is toassemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offersseveral advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge,exp 60
- "Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews w 69
- It is more important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends. 60
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 60
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:“The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is es 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hich the corporation resides also plays an major role in companys evolution in fut...
^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ays an major role in companys evolution in future. Any corporation, say, on a big or s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29780564263 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14408654706 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526645768025 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1536655829 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279596944674 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101110126539 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667660697227 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17278664795 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153112903277 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.