The given line graph reveals the information about the water consumed by three different sectors among the world in the last century. The given table compares water consumption and population in Brazil and Congo.
It is apparent that the total number of water consumed worldwide between 1900 and 2000 increased dramatically, by the largest amount used for agriculture. In the year 2000, Brazil consumed more water than that of Congo. Furthermore, In 1900, approximately 500km3 used for agriculture in the whole world, compared to the amount consumed on both domestic and industrial sectors. Between 1900 and 1950, the amount of water used for each sector rose very slightly. From 1950 onward, the water amount used for agriculture climbed up by reaching approximately 3000km3 in the year 2000. Moreover, In 2000, the figures for domestic and industrial use reached only about 1000 km3 and 500 km3 respectively.
Overall, In 2000, Brazil, which had 176 million population, consumes much more water than Congo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and population in Brazil and Congo. It is apparent that the total number of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 1000 km3 and 500 km3 respectively. Overall, In 2000, Brazil, which had 176 ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72389815459 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577639751553 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1606748053 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.