Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
While some museums charge a fee to visitors, others cost nothing. this essay agrees that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks. This essay shall demonstrate that, when admissions are charged, the amount can be used for maintenance of the structure and it also helps in keeping the environment clean, followed by an analysis of how the primary disadvantage, namely, reduction in number of visitors, is invalid.
To begin with, the entry fees collected from people can be used for maintenance purposes. Every building undergoes some damages in their lifetime and needs maintenance and repair to extent their lifespan. This can be initiated by the entrance fee collected from guests. For example, the Kerala History museum in my own hometown was renovated using the fund that they obtained from people visiting the site. In addition, putting an entrance fee reduces the environmental damage caused by over population. This is because it limits the number of visitors as only relevant people who are interested in the subject comes in. For instance, the recent survey conducted by World Heritage Protection Chamber found that percentage of people visiting museums has been reduced by 40% with the introduction of admission fees in 2019.
However, it is stated that the fee system reduces the number of people visiting the site and it is a negative trend. Despite the fact that it reduces the number, it is always better to preserve a site than destroy it with over-crowded people who are never interested in the field of area and finds it as a place just to hangout with others.
In conclusion, I do support the idea that a small admission charge benefits the museums in many ways despite the drawbacks it has.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-04-28 | Srishti0831 | 61 | view |
2021-07-22 | JJsidhu | 73 | view |
2020-12-09 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
2020-12-02 | Abdullahmr | 56 | view |
2020-10-20 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
- Wealthy nations should assist pooper countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- You have seen an advertisement for a community college that needs teachers for night classes.Write a letter to the community college. In your letter:say which advertisement you are answeringdescribe which course(s) you want to teach, and what it/they woul 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 56
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...a fee to visitors, others cost nothing. this essay agrees that the advantages outwei...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04225352113 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69323618102 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9789166456 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257043852211 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882421154679 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879043859737 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163797415394 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880726605139 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.