The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.
The bar chart indicates the data about the number of Japanese tourists traveling outside of their home country from 1985 to 1995. The line graph illustrates the percentages of those coming to Australia within the same period.
Overall, it is clear that the number of people traveling abroad in Japan and the proportions of those visiting Australia both increased significantly with some minor fluctuations during the period.
As displayed in the first graph, the number of Japanese tourists went up from 5 million people in 1985 to 11 million in 1990. However, it slightly declined to around 10.5 million in the next year, but then made a recovery and remained stable during 1992 and 1993 at about 12 million people. In the last two years, it continued to rise and reached a peak of 15 million people in 1995.
Similarly, in the second chart, the percentage of tourists visiting Australia rose significantly from 2% to approximately 4.5% in the first four years. Despite the constant growth, it went down by a small proportion of 0.5% in the next year, only to recover and increase again from 1989 to 1993. Finally, in 1994, it slightly dropped once again down to only 6%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-22 | Sơn Joyous | 78 | view |
2019-09-22 | Sơn Joyous | 84 | view |
2019-09-22 | Sơn Joyous | 89 | view |
2019-09-04 | TRAN DUC AN | 78 | view |
2019-09-04 | TRAN DUC AN | 84 | view |
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The diagram below shows the process from Australian Bureau of Meteorology of collecting up-to-minute information for the purpose of producting reliable weather forecasts.Describe the process in detail. 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information, report main features and make comparison where necessary 67
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 Summarise the main features and make comparisons where needed 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90049751244 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62740270404 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572139303483 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2477305064 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23503716738 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094141502553 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107798445286 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144538781491 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838555868293 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.