The pie charts compare the proportions of people falling into three distinct age groups in
Yemen and Italy in two different years.
It is clear that Italy had the older population in the year 2000, and that the same is
predicted for the year 2050. The populations of both countries are expected to age over
the fifty-year period.
In the year 2000, just over half of the population of Yemen was aged 14 or under, while
most Italians (61.6%) fell into the 15 to 59 age group, and only 14.3% were children under
15 years of age. People aged 60 or over accounted for almost a quarter of the Italian
population, but only 3.6% of the inhabitants of Yemen.
By 2050, the proportion of children under 15 is predicted to drop in both countries, most
noticeably in Yemen where the figure is expected to fall by 13.1%. On the other hand, the
figures for elderly people are expected to rise, by 2.1% in Yemen and a massive 18.2% in
Italy. Finally, it is anticipated that the 15 to 59 age group will grow by around 10% in
Yemen, but shrink by around 15% in Italy.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- [Test 3- Cam 9] The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53333333333 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38092352758 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8562696222 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185003320743 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892761272313 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310627885642 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070387361475 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411886766655 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.