For the time being, tend to living in the cities with ultra modern facilities has become increasingly prevalent. Number of people believes using cities amenities make their life more comfort or bring a myriad of merits to their social communication. Conversely, some individuals tend to live in countryside and chose to avoid the hectic life style of urban region. This essay deals with the arguments for and against this controversial issue.
First of all, there are clear evidence that nowadays the population of cities are booming because of its benefits for individuals, for instance, people have ability to use sport clubs, social communication, educational facilities, municipal equipments and so on. Another beneficial point is related to the social hierarchy, at least in our country, on the word, people who live in cities assume their self in upper social level than the people who live in the suburb area. Therefore there has always been a gravitation toward the urban life among some people in the rural area.
Secondly, rural life style lead to relish another aspects of living. Eating healthy food, breathing fresh air, seclude you self and your family from polluted area make many positive impression on your mind and your physical abilities. while one encounter with huge amount of carbon dioxide the chance of taking respiratory disease will be increased significantly, so the quality of urban healthy life style will be diminished in comparison with rural life style.
By the way of conclusion, I believe that the beneficial points of cities are not out weight of the anarchy and polluted environment of the city, on the other hand if I have my own choice I will settle in a remote distance of rural area. I think living in the city skirt to take advantages of healthy life will be more interesting in the near future.
- The chart below show the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The flow chart illustrate the consequences of deforestation.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.Write at least 150 words. 11
- Mobile telephones have brought many benefits but they have also negative effects. Do the disadvantages of having mobile phones outweigh the advantages? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. 78
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility all. What is your opinion? 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the people who live in the suburb area. Therefore there has always been a gravitation tow...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... your mind and your physical abilities. while one encounter with huge amount of carbo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, for instance, i think, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01960784314 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69227102916 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3006494613 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271215966827 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987080268638 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682691301451 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166586443011 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678764407544 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.