Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage.
Both the reading and the lecture discuss chevalier memoir. The article states that all the memoires are lie and Chevalier got them made and provides three reason of support. However, the professor explains that his memoirs are truth and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that albeit he was wealthy person and spent a main times on gambling and parties, but the chevalier borrow sums of money from a merchant. The professor opposes this point by saying that when the chevalier sells, so waits for money. In fact, waiting for own money and maybe loan money from merchant until his asserts convert into money. The chevalier also states that when he ran out of cash he should borrow money.
Second, the article posits that there are doubtful clues about conversation between the chevalier and the famous writer. On the contrary, the professor says that when the chevalier after a conversation came back home, immediately he wrote all of that conversation. According to the professor, actually, the chevalier kept all of that notes and wrote the memoires based on that notes.
Third, the reading states that critics are skeptical about the chevalier escaping from Venice's prison. Additionally, critics say that the Chevalier's jailers were bribed to free him. The professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that since the chevalier escaped from the prison, the prison got repaired.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 70
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 63
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 61
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement? The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d refutes each of the authors reasons. First, the reading claims that albeit he...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an out of cash he should borrow money. Second, the article posits that there ar...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ote the memoires based on that notes. Third, the reading states that critics a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11206896552 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43944193049 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556034482759 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1650663243 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2307692308 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0729731508704 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300086759901 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324313482075 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047819982993 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330090341338 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.