When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development of society, the man who is both have the ability to handle the relationship with the colleagues and finishes the work belongs to him is more required. In my view, due to work together and share the experiences could make the students learn much more effectively. First of all, working together is more efficiency than work alone. The most different between human and other creatures is that we have formed a system which makes us work together and efficiency. Take the conference as an example, we may find everyone who attends a conference will obey the rules and have their job to do, thus everything works properly. But it is hard to say if we put about a hundred monkeys or other animals to a place where could hold a conference. Secondly, while the teachers assign projects to your group, and you get no idea about how to handle this, the senior would probably helps you a lot because they are have more experiences and horizons, under the guidance of them, the difficulty met before would seems much easier and then to enrich the satisfactions of work finished. Last but not least, it is obvious to know the company which had already became well-known and made great progress are not only works by one brilliant people. Take my favorite NBA team Lakers as an example, Kobe is a famous NBA point guard who won the league champion more than once, but such great process without Shaq made great efforts wouldn't be possible. In conclusion, nowadays work together is much more efficiency and needed. It is no doubt that we should handle the ability to work together and learn from group mates to develop ourselves whatever in projects during studying or working.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 888, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
... handle this, the senior would probably helps you a lot because they are have more ex...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 921, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...obably helps you a lot because they are have more experiences and horizons, under th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1017, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...f them, the difficulty met before would seems much easier and then to enrich the sati...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1162, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...s to know the company which had already became well-known and made great progress are ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1428, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...process without Shaq made great efforts wouldnt be possible. In conclusion, nowadays wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73129251701 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51780875255 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598639455782 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3329492467 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.454545455 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227050303164 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918992409485 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620473591242 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227050303164 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.