It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
“A man is known by the company he keeps” and the social groups play a crucial role in every person’s life in some way. Social groups can make or break an individual and thus are of paramount importance in every individual’s life whether the individual is aware of it or not. With which kind of groups does a person get involve with, greatly defines the person. I support the assumption for three primary reasons.
To begin with, social groups have a deep impact on every individual’s life may it be a human or an animal. Individuals tend to get familiar with groups of like-minded and similar interest individuals very easily. Very rarely, there may be individuals that belong to groups that do not match their interests or liking. This, in most cases, is unacceptable to the individual and consequently results in individual keeping distance from the particular group. For instance, wolves always stay in packs and being in a pack is the strength of any wolf. We may hardly notice any wolf that is not with a pack. In such cases, the wolf either gets caught or is attacked and killed by other animals or people. Thus, a group helps in identifying our strengths, our weaknesses and working on it while being a part of the group.
Further, social groups play a crucial role at every stage of an individual’s life. It is through these social groups, that individuals get together. For instance, children tend to form groups right at the school level. These groups are based on their interests, the things that they feel are right and wrong, etc. There may be certain individuals that focus on studies and eventually would come together as a group which in turn, enhances their overall characteristics and further helps to define individuals.
Further, on a broad scale, there may be certain ethnic groups and religious groups that focus and believe in certain ideals. For instance, an immigrant may seem to get acquainted quite easily with his fellow country-men. Thus, it is these social groups that help individuals bind together and to work in a cohesive manner.
Thus, to say that social groups play no role or do not affect an individual, even an isolated one, is absurd since social groups tend to affect every individual continuously. If not for the social groups that tend to have a lasting impact on an individual, would he/she be successful, is still an unanswered question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Vaibhav Panchal | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | pankajsolanki4007 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d further helps to define individuals. Further, on a broad scale, there may be ...
^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cohesive manner" with adverb for "cohesive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...p individuals bind together and to work in a cohesive manner. Thus, to say that social groups pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther and to work in a cohesive manner. Thus, to say that social groups play no ...
^^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...g impact on an individual, would he/she be successful, is still an unanswered ques...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for instance, kind of, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93398533007 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85426327199 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488997555012 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2889289403 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7272727273 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152130701518 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564732553766 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383315908519 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993910199056 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178058079526 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.