The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.
Write a report for a university lecture describing the information below.
Given chart shows estimated world literacy rates bu region and by gender for the year 2000.
There were shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender 2000. There were difference between male and female in different region. The bar chart compare the ratio of uneducational population divided by sex in six region of the word in 2000. Men and women unable to read or write made up 1% and 2% in developed countries. In comparison proportion of illiterates cities. In latin america and the Caribbean were higher 10% and 11%. In east asia and Oceania however, the gap was enormous there were 20% illiterates women compared to only 8% men.
As regard the other region Sub-Saharan africa had greater proportion of the unschooled population 48% and 30% men. A similar proportion was seen in arab states were 53% illiteracy rates of women and illiteracy rates of men was 28%. However, it noticeable that in south asia were illiteracy rates 57% and 34% respectively for women and men. Also south asia stood out as having worst illiteracy figure in year 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | parth patel officiall | 78 | view |
| 2014-03-13 | eddysuaib | 70 | view |
- The Chart derives the annual number of rentals and sales of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. Desribe the whole chart. 56
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.Write a report for a university lecture describing the information below. 78
- The chart below show the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country The survey was conducted in 2000 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...tional population divided by sex in six region of the word in 2000. Men and women unab...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...up 1% and 2% in developed countries. In comparison proportion of illiterates cities. In la...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the Caribbean were higher 10% and 11%. In east asia and Oceania however, the gap ...
^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and 34% respectively for women and men. Also south asia stood out as having worst il...
^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the worst'.
Suggestion: having the worst
...n and men. Also south asia stood out as having worst illiteracy figure in year 2000.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89010989011 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6182918554 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8010720996 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.1666666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246823720308 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106062107333 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155263989552 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261568548531 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193964682364 0.0819641961636 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.