The graph below shows the average retirement age of males and females in six
countries in 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table elucidates information about the average age of retirement of men and
women in 2003, in six countries, namely Australia, the US, Japan, Italy, France and Korea. It
can be observed that Italy and France have lower retirement ages, as compared to those in
the other given countries.
In Australia, men retired at the age of 64 years 1 month and the women at the age of 63 years
5 months. The average retirement age of American males was 65 and a half years, and that of
females was 64 years and two months.
Japan and Korea had a higher average retirement age, both for men and women. Japanese
and Korean men retired at the ages of 67 years 4 months and 68 years 8 months, respectively.
The women in Japan and Korea retired at the ages of 66 years 9 months and 67 years 2
months, respectively. The retirement age in Korea was the highest among all the given
countries.
Italy and France had lower retirement ages, as compared to the other given countries. Italian
males and females retired at the ages of 58 years 2 months and 57 years 3 months,
respectively. French men’s average retirement age was 57 years 4 months and the French
women retired at the age of 57 years 9 months.
Overall, it can be said that the Korea had the maximum retirement age for both men and
women and France had the minimum, among the given six countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-27 | mohit 2000 | 70 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 . Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main feature , and make comparisons where relevant . 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK whoused the Internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selectingand reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different material that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country .Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant . 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK whoused the Internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selectingand reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows the number of marriages in the UK between 1951 and 2001 The data given is for all marriages remarriages any partner and first marriages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5951417004 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55094143432 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.368421052632 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5112063738 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5833333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169789313242 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924694234685 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425661364737 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794902065981 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520385687269 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.