There is no shortage of debate about the fact that the ability to manage a group of people is essential for any collective undertaking to be successful. Without proper coordination or objectives issued from a certain individual, many team works or group activities might yield nothing but chaos. I completely disagree with the idea that leadership skill comes naturally. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, there is no course which educates people about leadership mysteries. This is because that people born with the leadership ability in any field, so others could not teach them this skill. My own experience is compelling example of it. When I was nine years old, it would be competition among students in groups in my school. My teacher suggested me to be our group’s leader, but leadership term was strange to me. She believed that I can do this job more efficiently than my classmates, so I started competition with this position. I discussed all questions with my team, and chose an appropriate answer. As a result, we won the competition, and I am selected the best leader among groups.
Secondly, in every facet of people there are always a leader and a follower. Leader is the person responsible for the well-being of the group, how they will succeed in work or craft. Leadership is a skill that is innate and there is no need for formal training to become successful leader. For example, my friend Jack runs his company in Baku. He really knows how to handle people well and his employees respect him because they feel Jack will help them to come out of their shell and shine. He pushes his employees to the full potential and later on will learn how to stand by themselves. When I ask my friend why does he have good leadership skills, he just answer it's born naturally and he is fortunate enough that he can guide and motivate his employee to improve themselves.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea that leadership ability comes naturally. This is because that there is no person who teaches people this ability. It born with people and follows them in their lifetime
- TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 81
- TPO 36 integrated writing 3
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task 3
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75733333333 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67444997461 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557333333333 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8131968898 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0909090909 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0454545455 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86363636364 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18366457999 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603907035271 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595274264972 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119958330175 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289109847544 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.