planting the genetically modified trees
Both the author and the lecturer discuss whether genetic modification improve characteristics of trees or not. The passage claims that planting the genetically modified trees provides some benefit for farmers and trees themselves. The professor, on the other hand, completely reject whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about chance of survival. According to the passage, the genetically modified trees are resistance to the ring-spot problem. Thus, they are stronger than natural trees. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author’s view and illustrates the idea that these trees resist in a particular situation and if climate and the type of pests, it is likely that all the trees be wipe out.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecture discuss the economic aspect of planting the genetically modified trees. The author argues that these modified trees have some economic benefits such as growing faster and providing more returns that lead to a huge investment for the farmers. However, the professor refutes this, saying that planting the genetically modified trees have several hidden costs and by law, the farmers have to pay the company for seeds every time they plant.
Eventually, the passage and the lecture address the subject of exploitation. The passage goes on to mention that planting the genetically modified trees satisfies the demand for wood, so it prevents damaging the local wild trees. In contrast, the professor points out that these trees are destructive to natural trees because they grow fast among natural trees and use a great deal of resources such as water, light and so on, Therefore, they crowd out the natural trees.
All in all, the author maintains that planting the genetically modifying trees is a positive change, while the professor not only completely cast doubt on it, but he also demonstrates that they impose some costs and problems to the nature and farmers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | ghazalsaed1995 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | ghazalsaed1995 | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow student or co-workers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Use specific reasons and examples t 80
- coal ashtpo 42 3
- Parents today are more involved in their children’s education. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd use a great deal of resources such as water, light and so on, Therefore, they ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26959247649 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67041955763 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6879622595 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510723440195 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194655078604 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162944931823 0.0662205650399 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326387635299 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793241330703 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.