TPO 48
In this set of material, article mentions three main method to prevent frog species decreasing, on the other hand, the lecture casts doubt that on information which is presented in the reading section and believes that the information is not convincing enough.
First of all, the the author conteds that restriction on pesticide will stop frog speciees to decline or even extinct. In the contrast the constructor claims that it is neither economical practical or fair to the framer who live near from the frog species. Case farmers need pesticide to decrease crop loss and stay competitive in the market.
In addition, the reading asserts that a skin fungus is another factor that increases the thickness of skin and leads to dehydration. And applying antifungal medication or heat treatment will kill this fungus. However the speaker in the listening refutes this point and posits that it is impossible to aply these two mentioned methods to frogs species. Antifungal medication and heat treatment require to catch each frog individually and it does not stop fungus to their offspring. People have to do it round by round. Therefore, second point in the passage does not hold the water.
Despite the statement in the reading passage that human activities threat frog's habitats, but professor reputes that the real threat of frog habitat is global warming. The research shows global warming contributes to some disappearance of waterland or wetland. Hence the third points is untenable from professor's explanation.
- TPO 50 3
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have. But now it’s considered as a good quality of a person. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 70
- The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that whole societies expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 73
- TPO 48 Integrated 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...not convincing enough. First of all, the the author conteds that restriction on pest...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...not convincing enough. First of all, the the author conteds that restriction on pest...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...that it is neither economical practical or fair to the framer who live near from t...
^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r heat treatment will kill this fungus. However the speaker in the listening refutes th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'catching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: catching
...l medication and heat treatment require to catch each frog individually and it does not ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogs habitats, but professor reputes that the real threat of frog habitat is globa...
^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... disappearance of waterland or wetland. Hence the third points is untenable from prof...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24590163934 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74650103563 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598360655738 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5303637821 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4615384615 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324669286942 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093470653397 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579288954507 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169461712899 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451011512181 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.