The line graph demonstrates the changes in the emissions of CO2 in four European countries from 1967 to 2007.

Essay topics:

The line graph demonstrates the changes in the emissions of CO2 in four European countries from 1967 to 2007.

The line graph demonstrates the Changes in the emissions of carbon dioxide in for European countries from 1967 to 2007.
In 1967,reproduces the largest quantity of carbon dioxide among four countries near by 11 metric tons, while the Sweden was just around 9 metric tons. uk has slight decrease in the amount of cow products. Sweden production of co2 soared to just above 10 metric tons. Over a 20 year period both uk ans and Sweden reduced their amount of co2 emissions but the drop was more significant in Sweden.
Frocm 1967 to 1997, Portugal and italy showed a continuous rise in the average release of gas per body with less than 2 and 5 metric tons to almost 6 to 8 metric tons. This number has been constant until 2007.
Finally, uk and Sweden which initially showed a high co2 output, saw a decline in emissions towards the and of period. In comparison, italy and Portugal which started with low emissions , saw increases by the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-08 Mitesh 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emonstrates the Changes in the emissions of carbon dioxide in for European countr...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...European countries from 1967 to 2007. In 1967,reproduces the largest quantity ...
^^^
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the largest quantity of carbon dioxide among four countries near by 11 metric t...
^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...of carbon dioxide among four countries near by 11 metric tons, while the Sweden was ju...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Uk
...e Sweden was just around 9 metric tons. uk has slight decrease in the amount of co...
^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a 20 year period both uk ans and Sweden reduced their amount of co2 emissions bu...
^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the average release of gas per body with less than 2 and 5 metric tons to almost ...
^^
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant until 2007. Finally, uk and Sweden which initially showed a high co2 output...
^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... showed a high co2 output, saw a decline in emissions towards the and of period. ...
^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and of period. In comparison, italy and Portugal which started with low emission...
^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ortugal which started with low emissions , saw increases by the end of the period....
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63529411765 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54070517599 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9755954965 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298495070741 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123816349053 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195360432277 0.0843802449381 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229499025586 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255456034392 0.0819641961636 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.