The bar chart illustrates the amount of creating and using electricity in ten different countries in 2014. The unit was measured by billion Kwh.
It can be seen in the figures that china was the country which used and produced electricity most. And there was just a small difference between the quantity of electric production and consumption in all of the countries.
In more detail, in 2014, China reached the peak of the chart with over 5.300 billion kWh in both two groups, production and consumption. The United States followed with the electricity quantity of about 4000 billion kWh in both groups. The next positions in the chart were Russian and Japan, the amount of creating and using electricity of these countries that were around 1000 and 900 billion kWh respectively.
In the rest of the chart, the countries all have quantities of producing and using electricity that was quite equal to each other, just under about 800 billion kWh in both groups, especially The Korean Republic was the bottom of the chart with about 450 billion kWh. This figure was very small if compared with China, the country culminated at about 5000 billion kWh or The United States chased to with 4000 billion kWh in 2014. There was a tiny difference that Germany, the only country in the chart had the producing electricity was higher than consuming electricity.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... electric production and consumption in all of the countries. In more detail, in 2014, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94323144105 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59851380295 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480349344978 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.929017747 43.030603864 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137397116416 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775861794616 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568360169204 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113201717011 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343223010278 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.