Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is considered by some that the number of seats for each subject in the universities should be distributed equally between the genders. In my opinion however, such preset and filtration would ruin the opportunity for some students who would be qualified if we follow the merit base criteria.
Having the same number of man and women on all courses is unrealistic I believe, because hardly we can find the same number of eligible applicants on each group. While for some courses there are the same number of female and male candidates, the other courses are more popular with one gender than the other, for example in my country, engineering courses tend to attract more male applicants, or nursing is more applied by women. But the problem is that we cannot have the hypothesis of equal distribution of eligible candidates on each group of genders. By eligible I intend those who have tried harder and prepared more for the university.
In fact the real question is that which student is eligible and how can we set merit base criteria? I believed that institutions should continue to select the best candidate for each course based on their qualifications and achievements i.e. their related CVs. In this condition everyone is given the same chance of admission regardless to which gender belongs. Otherwise, the equal arrangement of the seats not only will prevent many deserving candidates from gaining admission just because they belong to the other gender, it would also cause some side effects such as destroying the competition spirit between students.
I believe gender segregation would not provide equal opportunities for every applicant, so I strongly disagree with such unwise and unfair criterion, and would say merit should be evaluated.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 84
- The following appeared in a memorandum from a dean at Omega University.Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professo 54
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if we follow the merit base criteria. Having the same number of man and women ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and prepared more for the university. In fact the real question is that which ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e competition spirit between students. I believe gender segregation would not p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10069444444 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75451850655 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6721733051 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.9 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142502169516 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592715220554 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561928704191 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921760371796 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333045799526 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.