Governments and international organizations are facing global problems. Provide solutions.
Recently, the phenomenon of governments and international organizations are facing global problems and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that international organizations can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, facing global problems can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, global problems in governments might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of solving international problems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Countries are faced with decreasing the birth rate and increasing aging population. What do you think are the causes and effects of this? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93827160494 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39207500499 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662551440329 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1454589952 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.181818182 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1859366377 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636724543274 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909877235549 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099151023734 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735254300856 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.