The chart below shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998
The table compares the percentage of income spent on food, electronic equipment, music and videos by the adults and children in the United Kingdom in 1998.
Overall, adults in the UK spent the most on food in 1998, while children spent the least on this item. It is also noticeable that children's biggest percentage of income was allocated to music and adults' smallest proportion of money could be seen on videos.
Women's expenditure on food was by far the highest at 39%, followed by adults and men at a quarter and 14% respectively. By contrast, children, boys and girls spending were just between 9 and 11%. With regard to electronic equipment, children spent the highest percentage of income overall at 23%.
The proportion of income used for buying music by children, boys and girls were the highest at approximately 40% each as compared to adults, men and women who had similar figures at 5%. The spending on videos by adults, men and women were insignificant ranging between 0.5% and 2% only but their counterparts paid out less than 20% of their income for this item.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-16 | prathamp114 | 84 | view |
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. 11
- The bar graph below show the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000. 61
- Some people say that television is useful for education while others say it is useful only for entertainment. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 67
- The charts below show the primary purposes for British people leaving their country in 1999 and the amount of those people who left the country for less than a week. 67
- Global warming is becoming a huge threat to human existence on this planet What are the causes of this What are the effects 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'childrens the biggest'.
Suggestion: childrens the biggest
...n this item. It is also noticeable that childrens biggest percentage of income was allocated to m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'adults the smallest'.
Suggestion: adults the smallest
...ge of income was allocated to music and adults smallest proportion of money could be seen on vi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86486486486 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65248481158 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545945945946 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1599162405 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297807623228 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143734581983 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103092811006 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208053570637 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107214819552 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.