the chart showns compenents of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000
The bar graph compares the GDP in the UK by two part of GDP, namely IT industry and service Industry. Over the period eight years. It is measured in percentage.
Overall, It can be seen that both components of GDP in the UK increased significantly from 1992 to 2000, and IT experienced the fastest growth.
The figures for IT industry was higher than service Industry by 1992, with over 6 percent of GDP and around 4 percent respectively. There was a dramatic rise in service industry of GDP from 1994 to 1996, accounted for 7% in 1996. By contrast, the IT remained stable at the same time with 8%.
The GDP in the UK saw rapid growth by IT, with 12% in 1998 and after reaching a peak at nearly 15% by 2000. This figures for service was 7,5% in 1998 and about 8% at the end of the period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where releva 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... accounted for 7% in 1996. By contrast, the IT remained stable at the same time with 8...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 643.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28666666667 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45334239129 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 180.9 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5105404843 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4444444444 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247016329303 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901406850653 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096779180474 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162722924433 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757425179197 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.31 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.