Nowadays the most high-level jobs are done by men. Should jobs be reserved for women by the government? What are the effects of this?
Recently, the phenomenon of nowadays the most high-level jobs are done by men and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that jobs reserved for women by the government can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, high-level jobs in companies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, reserving jobs for women might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of professional jobs in the government for women far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | 3pid | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-11 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? 85
- Some people believe that laws can change human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples. 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
- Regions and countries' geography situation affect people's behavior and their success. What is your opinion? 85
- Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions? Discuss 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66929133858 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26621728248 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657480314961 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9369059457 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.909090909 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359687929604 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114366674474 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108460287555 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192734999577 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109640380413 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.