The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes effected three regions of the world during 1990.
There are a pie chart and table which overlook causes of worldwide land degradation and how these effected three regions of the world during 1990.
Based on the pie chart, these were introduced three main causes for declining productivity in farm land. It is immediately apparent that over-grazing had major impact (35%) on it. Also, deforestation and over-cultivation, both, together would have almost same shares in land degradation (30%-28%). Apart from these, other causes had slight effect on land degradation.
Table compares effects of introduced causes on three regions namely, North America, Europe and Oceania. Total land degraded in the Europe was more than other two regions. As it can be observed, over-grazing in Oceania and deforestation played an important role in declining land productivity.
To wrap it up, dependent on a region and its geographical properties, the cause of land degradation differs. For example, Europe is a continent full of forest and its main cause for degradation was deforestation.
- TPO1.WRITING ABOUT DECREASING WORKING DAY 70
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Somepeople regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuablework experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.What are your opinions on this? 61
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or dis agree with this opinion.? 67
- The chats below show the number of Japanese tourist travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40625 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12719298053 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64375 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.033518261 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29735443274 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127072259358 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134935301556 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219106914717 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147874092989 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.