The charts show information about the number of
Kilometres travelled in an average month and in the distribution of vehicle types in Britain
The given line graph describes how many kilometres travelled monthly Britain spent on different aims between 1990 and 2010 and the pie charts depict the percentage of distinct kinds of vehicle in England in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that transport / delivery was the most popular reason and cars were the most common type of vehicle.
Transport/ delivery was the highest during the period. In 1990, being just above 6500 kilometres, the number of kilometres used on transport/ delivery decreased sharply after peaking at nearly 8000 in 5 years. Moreover, the others fluctuated minimally around 3000 for personal reason, 2000 for commuting.
In terms of vehicle types, in both years, the total proportion of cars and trucks was about 90%. In 1990, standing at 63%, the rate of cars experienced a minimal drop, while that of trucks rose gradually from 25% to 30% . Buses, motorcycles and other changed slightly. In particular, they accounted for lower than 10% each.
- The charts show information about the number ofKilometres travelled in an average month and in the distribution of vehicle types in Britain 78
- Households with a regular use of a car , Great Britain 73
- The map shows 2 possible sites for the supermarket 56
- The process shows how plants create food 56
- Households with a regular use of a car , Great Britain 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of trucks rose gradually from 25% to 30% . Buses, motorcycles and other changed sl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10625 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55675554817 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.71875 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.039700947 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108777034697 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326272044473 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471448710344 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601200981761 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479169432741 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.