TPO 19
The focus of the reading and lecture are on buzzing, which is a tactic for advertising a product to the people they meet and praising it as someone who just appreciates a product and not being paid by a company. Despite the author's statement that the buzzing has caused many problems, the lecturer holds an opposing view. He is of the opinion that critics are misleading and they give the wrong impression. He brings up a number of contradictory points in its rejection.
First of all, the author holds the idea that the consumers should know that the person who is advertising the product is getting paid. It is mentioned that people expect truth from individuals and the may get the wrong information. The lecturer denies this notion and states that it is not true that the consumers may get incorrect information regarding the product. Furthermore, he argues that buzzers advertise a product that is certain about its great characteristic, so people will not get the wrong information.
Secondly, the writer contends that people listen to the buzzers less critically. The article notes that this matter may hurt the consumers since they will be less suspicious about the advertisement they hear. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that this idea is not true because people ask a lot of questions when a product is being introduced to them. He elaborates on this by explaining that since the buzzer is using the specific product he/she can answer the questions about the price and services of the product. In this regard, the consumers will have whole information and will not mislead.
Finally, it is claimed in the article that buzzing can hurt the social life of the people. The author establishes that when people know about the real purpose of the buzzer and the fact that he/she is being paid to advertise the product, they will become less trustful of people. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that it is not true that buzzing destroys civilization. He puts forth the notion that when people have good experience in the product that was introduced to them by an individual, they become more trustful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ot being paid by a company. Despite the authors statement that the buzzing has caused m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.48453608247 267% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 3.03092783505 858% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 32.9175257732 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 937.175257732 189% => OK
No of words: 362.0 206.0 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89502762431 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66766741496 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453038674033 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 290.88556701 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 10.0 0.824742268041 1212% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.6469311312 44.8134815571 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.235294118 76.5299724578 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 16.8248392259 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 4.34317383033 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.49484536082 602% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 41.2886597938 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.