All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Firstly, companies vary in size and thus, they take different approaches depending on their company's need. For example, a large company may have too many employees to conduct an internal process review. In this case, the need for a consultant may be best to efficiently cut through the red tape that often slows down progress towards efficiency. Similarly, a company may have multiple locations spread across the globe, and perhaps even speaking multiple languages. It will be difficylt for a company to pull efforts together, however, the need for a consultant who undertands the culture would be more suitable.
Secondly, the task needed to listen to employees may present problems instead of leading to efficiency. The unstated assumption is that employees are not part of the problem, and often they are. For example, it would be harder for an employee to view his/her work as inefficient, whereas an outside entity might apply standards for the specific industry to assess whether there may be room for efficency. Additionally, if the company culture is not in favor of openly expressed disagreements, it may cause employees to stay silent in order to keep their jobs, causing the problems to persist. Thus, the statements' claim of employers listening to their employees might not hold true because problems begin internaly in the first place.
Lastly, consultants often are specialized in handing the specific inefficiency that many face a company. They often have experienced professionals with a plothera of experience. A management consulting firm many help a company better that its internal counterparts, while a financial consulting group is better equipped to handle a specific inefficency that many stifle a company.
In conclusion, the position that a company listeing to its own employees many provide no need for a consultant yields itself to a number of critiques. These critiques help strengthen the need for companies to prefer outside consultants than employees in the goal to achieving higher efficiency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...he first place. Lastly, consultants often are specialized in handing the specific ine...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun face seems to be countable; consider using: 'many faces'.
Suggestion: many faces
... handing the specific inefficiency that many face a company. They often have experienced ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun help seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much help', 'a good deal of help'.
Suggestion: much help; a good deal of help
...xperience. A management consulting firm many help a company better that its internal coun...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he goal to achieving higher efficiency.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, then, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 322.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32919254658 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95184660896 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8521712778 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.70786347227 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290015403114 0.218282227539 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100156004744 0.0743258471296 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616827653262 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181517928069 0.128457276422 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646945082287 0.0628817314937 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.