do you believe that parents should spend their little time playing with children or helping them at schiil work
In the progressive and sophisticated world where we live, parents are forced to work a lot so they do not have a lot of time to spend with their child and it is necessary to use this little time well. Reaching this goal, some parents to have fun by playing games or sports. While, others adhere to control and help children in things related to their school work. I support the first perspective because of some reasons that will be elaborated on following paragraph.
To begin with, playing with children improves their personal and social abilities. During a game they learn how collaborate with their parents which is necessary for prosperous in their future life and doing social responsibilities in society. Furthermore, they learn some personal and moral behavior like helping to others during their predicament or saying correct thing even it has some inappropriate consequences for them. To shed light on this matter, I will bring up an example in which I was involved. In the second year of bachelor studies at university we had an assignment related to psychology class to evaluate the effects of playing with children on enhancing their abilities. We examined various groups of parents that spend time with their children by playing and helping them in their classwork. The results were compatible with our first hypotheses that children who played with their parents had better performance in their personal and social life in future because during a play their learn some main abilities and their parents modify their irrelevant behavior with others. This example aptly illuminates how important and beneficial it is to play with children to guarantee their future life.
Second, the more parents play with children the more they will know about them. Hectic life separates children from their parents so they cannot speak about their problems in their life with them. During a play, children feel that their parents are their best friends so speak about their predicaments and request parents to help them for solving them. Parents will also get more information about their physical or spiritual situation and strive to help them for better performance. The Asian society of managing homeless children declares that about 70 percent of them could not speak about their problems with their parents because they were so busy and always strive to solve their economic problems than personal ones. Many psychologist believe that knowing about children problems as soon as it is possible, helps them to change their life situation. It also helps societies to control the rates of crimes that creates because of domestic violence.
In conclusion, collecting all reasons and examples into account, one can conclude that playing with children is a convenient way for parents to use their little time. Since, they can improve their children's personal and social abilities they can help them to become prosperous in the future, Furthermore, they can get information about children's situation and help them to solve their problems.
- companies should hire their employees for a small period than entire life 73
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 70
- childrens rely on technology for entetainment but playin outside with friendsis better for them 86
- for a successful developement of a country it is more important for the government to spend money on education of very young children than to spend money on universities 71
- the rules of society for young people are strict 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2547.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15587044534 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59217225124 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445344129555 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9474038278 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5238095238 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45861198491 0.236089414692 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169971731315 0.076458572812 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971714977488 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302359597264 0.150856017488 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385621847779 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.