Science gives people life expectancies of close to 100 years or even more. Some people view it in a positive light but others believe it creates some problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
New medical technologies have the possibilities to increase the life expectancy of people to 100 years or more. Although some people take it in a positive note but others feel it may provoke some problems. This essay will discuss both views of increasing the life expectancy.
To begin with, Medical advancements have made the people and their loved ones to live longer. This kind of technological inventions have made life easier and comfortable. Transplanting a new organ has made this possibility of making a human body to work longer by replacing with a damaged organ. Moreover it is a result of human evolution and their cognitive level of problem solving skills. Furthermore, this has paved the way to new research methodologies in the field of medical sciences apart from organ transplants.
On the other hand, these achieved medical inventions are considered as against the natureby some people. Even though, the life expectancy is increased but still people will be weak in their older age and will always need someone to support for their daily activities. Furthermore, the population of the old aged people will increase to a certain level and their cost of operation and other expenses will fall on the younger generations, where they are generally scared of it. Even if the increasing the life expectancy comes under practice, the financial ability to afford for that will not be possible to all the class of people.
In conclusion, Human evolution has made huge contribution in the field of medical inventions and it will continue to do so. Even though, the chance of living a longer life provoke some problems, but the growth of new inventions will be unavoidable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-21 | Suman1234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Ammu helen | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Ammu helen | 76 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PUBLIC BUILDINGS SUCH AS MUSEUM,TOWN HALLS AND SPORTING FACILITIES IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN RENOVATIONS OF EXISTING ONES,WHILE OTHERS DISAGREE.DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION. 56
- 1 Gambling is an activity which causes more harm than good and so should be made illegal in all countries To what extent do you agree or disagree give reasons and examples to support your response 75
- what is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane and explain why. 11
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibity ofthe producer to avoid extra packaging of the products. Give your views or any relevantexamples with your own experience. 55
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country. You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture.Write a letter to your landlord. In your letterintroduce yourselfexplain what is wrong with the furnit 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...nger by replacing with a damaged organ. Moreover it is a result of human evolution and t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, apart from, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05376344086 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8605384246 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3859911172 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224936748499 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852619709553 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808030377617 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16260555027 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141997115978 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.