It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In our contemporary life, there is a widespread agreement that different people have their own inborn perks in a variety of fields, such as sport and music. It is also apparent that parents put high expectation on their offsprings of being excellent at all and train them to grow as a potential athletes or musicians. However, there are countless aspects and factors which need considering in this issue.
First, according to scientific reports, an ordinary human being was innately born with about seven type of intelligence, two of which consist of musical and physical talents. Thus, it is totally understandable that a part of children do not have preference to sport activities or art. Secondly, genetics can be ascribed as a specialised reason to explain for their inborn talent. Children in which families originally have prolonged tradition of playing sports and music for generations are easier to get initial access to these forms of intelligence. By contrast, having congenital health or cognitive problems could be big hurdle for them to reach the fluent level in these fields.
Nevertheless, there are no clear evidence proved for the impossibility of teaching children to become a sport person and musician. Parents and teachers play the critical role of encouraging their offsprings and students to find inspiration and the inner passion. Furthermore, no achievements do not require a vast deal of time and effort, using them in smart way will assist people succeed in taking up anything skillfully.
In conclusion, a great number of inner and outer factor make significant implications on the progress of developing physical and musical talent of human.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Esther Katlyn | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | morbymuku | 92 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below gives information on consumer expenditure on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'athlete'?
Suggestion: athlete
...l and train them to grow as a potential athletes or musicians. However, there are countl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 34, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'inners'?
Suggestion: inners
... In conclusion, a great number of inner and outer factor make significant impli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28731343284 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98254323637 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2030090987 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218008644856 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716701963885 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558063563927 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104323936106 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659121314448 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.