Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.
The social media by providing chasm information has a great impact on human beings. Television and movies as a part of this broad media are not exceptional from making the influence. The author at this prompt believes that the movies and television cause side-effects rather than the positive ones on the youth. This is the claim with which I generally do not concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to standpoint, I would list the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
The first striking reason which approves my disagreement with this assertation is the restricted controlling system observing the shows and programs presented on the television. Indeed, each television channel possesses a group of controllers who audit the programs whether matching with the channel roles or not. In this condition, the broadcasting of a malicious program on the TV seems to have a fewer chance. Furthermore, the same group categorized the programs at the various categories according to the age of audiences, or type of movie, or whether it contains the sense of war. According to this categorization, each movie or show is labeled at the beginning of its show to inform to reach its accurate audience. For instance, during the last five years in the television channels of Turkey, each program is labeled according to the age properties and asks the parents to not let their younger kids watch the programs not matching with their age. This example represents the controlling over the tv programs, and there is a low possibility of watching the improper program by the young generation.
Another equally crucial reason which should be highlighted is the consideration of how the television is informative. According to the noteworthy intelligent study conducted in the Social Media Center of Iran, each TV channel shows approximate 15 programs in each day, and 9 of these 15 programs are the scientific base. This study shows the two-third of programs on TV are informative and add a knowledgeable base for the individuals. Although there is the feasibility of that one of these programs indirectly propound misbehavior or violence; its small chance in the comparison of informative programs is too small. Consequently, it is not a fair perspective to overgeneralize the small possibilities to entire programs and underestimate the proliferate impact of TV in the educational aspect.
However, some people believe that long duration of watching the TV or movies have adversely affected the young generation and isolated them from society. Although this belief is logic and has sound bases, this side-effect is rooted in the lifestyle and not on the TV programs. In fact, modern lifestyle and youth habits differ from the previous generation, they merely self-centered and has fewer interactions with the surrounding. Also, the TV with its one-directional connection appeals to their appetite. In this condition, the effective method for handling this condition is forming the new habits instead of blaming the TV programs and movies.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly illustrate that TV and movies have a more positive impact. Since they are observed and rein by organizations, the number of instructive programs is higher.
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people 66
- tpo50.integ 3
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment – doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The social media by providing chasm info...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st conspicuous ones in what follows. The first striking reason which approves...
^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'inform' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
... at the beginning of its show to inform to reach its accurate audience. For instance, du...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oper program by the young generation. Another equally crucial reason which sho...
^^^
Line 5, column 744, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...es to entire programs and underestimate the proliferate impact of TV in the educational aspect....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act of TV in the educational aspect. However, some people believe that long d...
^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...lief is logic and has sound bases, this side-effect is rooted in the lifestyle and not on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, third, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2773.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30210325048 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16043313754 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506692160612 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 837.0 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2592582203 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.541666667 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7916666667 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133449278689 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429745034792 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049425538824 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887145428726 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494699712854 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 86.8835125448 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.