Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement?
Nowadays, travelling by train and public and private cars are both widespread, and the railway networks and roads are necessary to be expanded. Personally, I believe that constructing roads should be on a higher priority than the other. I feel this way for two reasons, which will be explored in following essay.
First of all, today people tend to travel by their own cars, rather than by train. More and more cars are being produced and sold every year, and it can be seen in cities, especially mega cities, that the streets and even highways are full of cars most of the time. Moreover, in developing and underdeveloped countries, because of the low price of petrol, it is more economical for families to use personal cars. As a result, while the rate of travelling by train remains almost steady, this rate for travelling by cars has had a significant raise. So, the government, as the representative of people, should allocate higher budget to building roads.
Second of all, there are numerous accidents happening every day in roads, cause injuries and dies. The train, however, is very safer vehicle, since few incidents are being reported caused by crashing a train. Fatal accidents cost the country so much money, because the medical expenditures and losing humans. As a result, it could be surmised that spending money on constructing new roads or widening current ones, has short-term and long-term benefits for government, and consequently for society.
On the other hand, it should be borne in mind that some kind of commodities can just be transferred by train, or at least transferring them by truck or other cars is not beneficial at all. The government is better to consider improving the rail network through all country, so can deliver necessary goods, such as fuel, to cities.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that more resources, including budget, planning and human resources, should be allocated to roads than railways. This is because the desire of citizens to use personal cars, and also because the costs that inappropriate roads would cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | moeinynsi | 84 | view |
| 2017-02-15 | taeyeng123 | 89 | view |
| 2016-07-26 | hatake kakashi | 78 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, at least, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04624277457 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.777810002 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575144508671 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7290148199 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899823531539 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324186901933 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305552828561 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500605832517 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100106995215 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.