The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that wre recycled form 1982 to 2010 in particular country.
Summarse the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons while relevant
The given line graph illustrates several types of material recycling over a thirty year period. Overall, paper and cardboards were the highest recycled materals following glass containers rating in second, which had some decrease in the beginning. While aluminum cans and plastics rating indicated only increase without any down falls.
Firstly the paper and cardboard usage recycling rate if fairly stable, woth some fluctuatation during 1982 to 1990. Afterwards its recycling percentage showed stable decrease with 10 per cent in over two decades. In contrast, glass containers recycling started with some decrease fro 1982 to 1986. Then subsequently started to grow and remained it unitl 2010.
Furthermore, aluminum cans recycling two year later in 1984, showed stable increase over a 25 years. While plastics recycling process, which started in 1986 rose relatively constant with some show of stabilization from 1992 to 1996.
- The Diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Time 16-to-24-year-olds spent per week on sport and exercise by gender. 73
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 61
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world.Why is this? What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...rs recycling started with some decrease fro 1982 to 1986. Then subsequently started...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62676056338 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68701425859 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.669014084507 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2312759081 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132962117393 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577301438451 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219750033113 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941234060232 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00774273752422 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.