The bar chart provides information about the five main reasons for the people in the United States to travel, while the pie chart illustrates the key problems for the citizens of US to travel.
Overall, to attend the work place, most of the people travelled and the main issue for the people is price incurred in travelling.
To begin with, 49% of US citizens travel from office to home and backwards, while 19% of the people travel for their personal reasons. To shop 16% of the people use travel as a means. However, to visit friends/ relatives and fro recreation purposes, people travel to a less extent accounting for 10% and 6% respectively.
During travelling, 49% of the people faced the problem of price incurred, while 19% of them had issues regarding safety. Drivers agreesion and congestion of highways created problem for 17% and 14% of the people respectively. However, the least problematic issues for the public are access to public transport and space for pedestrians with a respective values of 8% and 6%.
- To understand the important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities 50
- A persons worth now a days is judges according to material possessions and social status. Old fashioned values seems no longer i,portmanteaus. 61
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones.What forms do they take?Do you agree the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'value'?
Suggestion: value
...space for pedestrians with a respective values of 8% and 6%.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68530446825 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1149576938 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428249740259 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190456877402 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116186320578 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280837153501 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869922873309 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.