The graph shows the number of trips which was done by children in one country in 1990 and in 2010 travel to and from by using various types of transports.
The column bar chart illustrates the number of trips done by the school children who went and came back from a country using different types of transports in two decades 1990 and 2010.
At the onset, it is clear that children used to walk a lot for traveling in the previous decade, while in the last decade, juveniles made lots of trips on the car.
Now, turning into the details, In 1990, the number of trips, which accounted for more than 12 million in a year, was done by teenagers by walking on foot, however, the number of trips made by car, was only just above 4 million per year. Furthermore, there was an approximately similar number of trips done by children through cycling, which was roughly 6.1 million per year, and walking or using the bus, which accounted for just below 6 million per year. Besides that, the number of trips by children through bus was almost 7 million per year.
In 2010, the greater number of trips was done by the car among children almost 11 million per year, while the number of trips was covered on foot exactly 6 million. Although the number of trips plunged at 2 million per year, as it was done by cycling, the number of trips made by both on walking and driving was 3 million per year, and by bus was 5 million per year.
Finally, children visited more in 1990 than in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Dipa Hayat | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the wheat export in different countries in million of tonnes. 67
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services 79
- The graph shows the number of trips which was done by children in one country in 1990 and in 2010 travel to and from by using various types of transports. 67
- The pie chart shows the expenditure for Candian households in 1992 and 2002. 67
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49382716049 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25043815274 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460905349794 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.356444469 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.375 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340975429363 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193505941607 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642823913191 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209050301623 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739118153426 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.