Would you before to go to a small university in the countryside or a large university in the city?
Some people prefer studying in a large city university because they think that there will be more opportunities for their future career. Personally, I would rather study in a small university somewhere in the countryside due to the non-inferior quality of knowledge given there and the proximity to nature.
Today’s universities can provide the students with excellent facilities including libraries, laboratories, teaching staff and variety of options to develop future prospects. In fact, there are many laws and standards in education that allow youngsters to acquire equal skills and knowledge independently on where their university is situated. The differences are only in entertainment and the style of life. Moreover, the countryside university can be more specific in some directions by giving students peculiar materials such as natural science or agriculture, while large multidimensional universities are aimed at diverse industry satisfaction with a massive number of alumni. For example, many famous universities distant from downtown prefer to isolate students from the unnecessary bustling lifestyle to make the latters to be targeted on the study. Therefore, to think that the location of the university can impact on the quality of education would be unreasonable.
Indeed, the opportunity to touch nature while young people study could be the most inspiring moment for creativity and relaxation. Particularly those who need concentration and calm atmosphere to invent something or to advance existing projects could benefit from the being within the wall of the countryside university. On the other hand, it can be advantageous for professors who rather conduct their trials aloof of the hectic pace of industry development. Consequently, students who are interested in similar scientific questions can follow their professors to continue the work. Furthermore, both sides of the educational process prosper if the graduates decide to remain in the university village. Universities can obtain new employees, the past students can have a new job experience where they can adjust effortlessly because they do not need to overcome challenges associated with a new environment, people or finance.
In conclusion, the choice of the university depends on the preferences of those who are going to study in an academic atmosphere. If people like overcrowded streets with a variety of noises and rush time, the university in a large city would be their conscientious option. However, those who think of a calm atmosphere to be concentrated on something should choose a university which is far from speedy life temps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | jimHsu | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | mary.ssherr | 91 | view |
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The graph below shows the average monthly use of health club in Miami and Florida by all full-time members over last year. The pie charts show the age profile of male and female members. 84
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 84
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55583126551 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20997067417 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54094292804 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4361409736 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.705882353 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281958778848 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937650751074 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761908089106 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204616094974 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839042711243 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.