Animals debate
Animal activists are right when they object to animals being used in experiments
From the ancient times to nowadays, people have been trying to come up with the perfect treatment for all kinds of diseases. The process of trial and error used to being used through the centuries didn’t give even the thousandth part of success that the modern medicines has received for the last 100 years. It wouldn’t be able to be achieved without animals which are taking a significant part in all medicine experiments. They have made the all donkey work (instead of us) taking the brunt of negative consequences from using new medicines. They seem quite brave, don’t they? However, have they been agree with that? The animal activists don’t think so.
Truly, it sounds awful – we have been killing great many animals for what? For getting new kind of ointment or more badly new color of lipstick? Let’s try it on oneself. Imagine that your puppy or kitten is likely to be hurt or killed for getting new shampoo. Therefore, it is not honest in attitude to any species of animal, not only in attitude to somebody's pet.
However, on the other hand, can you answer how many lives have been rescued for these 100 years with help of medicines, which have been tested on animals? Millions and millions. And it includes not only human beings, it includes and animal beings – cows and their calves, horses and their colts, dogs and great variety of birds, reptiles, fish, mammals and so on. All of them have reproduced new generations and increased populations of different species (contains endangered species) in the wild.
From my point of view, in this case people who have already received quite high level in medicine and science ought to in the foreseeable future find out the new ways to test medicine. For instance, we have found the method of creating new cells. Why could we develop it for modern medicine? It would be able to save animals from suffering and calm down animal activists.
In conclusion, our generation should put more sense in it’s activity. 100 years ago there was not any other way to figure out the affect that could be got from using new treatment and we had to use animals for it. However, thanks to all done experiments our scientists have developed their knowledge to the extent on which we are able to find out new ways for getting new medicine, new cosmetics without harming any live creatures on Earth. Let’s do it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | KarinaShine | 78 | view |
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 66
- overconsumption in the modern world due to noticeable breakthroughs in machine learning, chemical and medical industries etc. 78
- Mind Challenges in the Modern World 78
- The persuading techniques used in out lives and not only 78
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...on't they? However, have they been agree with that? The animal activists don&apo...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 136, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...was not any other way to figure out the affect that could be got from using new treatment a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.48453608247 240% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 5.05154639175 297% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 32.9175257732 115% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 26.3917525773 235% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 937.175257732 219% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 425.0 206.0 206% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83294117647 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 3.78020617076 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48020983597 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 127.690721649 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543529411765 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 290.88556701 218% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 12.6804123711 189% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9481049616 44.8134815571 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5833333333 76.5299724578 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7083333333 16.8248392259 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45833333333 4.34317383033 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.29896907216 140% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128363340891 0.216113520407 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437382945934 0.0766984524023 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697608895097 0.0603063233224 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102986243469 0.12726935374 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737591967146 0.0580467560999 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 8.37731958763 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 8.71597938144 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 41.2886597938 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.