There are more than a single way to measure success, depending on one’s definition of success. Goals are set as director for human beings to thrive for, and they are usually one of the best indicators to access one’s accomplishment. However, when evaluating one’s success, we should also consider other factors, such as efficiency, the process, and the methods adopted to acclaim the fruits of victory.
Other factors are worth to consider other than the preset goals. The efforts that were put in during the process to achieve goals can be used as a success indicator. The target can be seen as a collective process of work. Thus, we cannot ignore the value of the process of pursuing goals. In the meantime of approaching goals, many might encounter other findings that are also considered achievements and are valued successful. For instance, many biochemistry research ended up with unexpected results. The research outcomes might not have the same effect as they were intended to design for, but they might be useful in other industries.
The time used in achieving a goal can also be used as a factor to access one’s success. Many share the same goals. Some might make them with shorter time. Thus, we can conclude that those individuals who achieve their goals within a shorter range of time have better efficiencies. Perhaps, faster development promises a one step closer to the next more significant innovation. For example, the U.S. in the 1960s launched the Moon and started discovering the unexplored land. A few other countries have also launched their satellites around the Moon decades after. What made the U.S. stand out was that it was the first country that achieved the goal. Thus, it could utilize the rest of the time in searching for life signs and other aeroespacial research on the Moon while other countries were still building their spaceship.
Besides achievement, human beings also care about what approaches are made to attain success. Unethical and illegal methods to achieve success might cause the opposite effect. In the athletic world, there has been a long-lasting issue of drug-abuse to enhancing the athletes' performance. For example, it has been proved that some countries have been using medical injections to boost their athletes' scores. Although many athletes have broken new records because of the aid of drugs, the public should not evaluate their achievement as a success since their approach to success is not considered ethical.
Success has its definition in every individual's mind. We shall not use a universal standard to judge everyone’s performance. Evaluations of time and efficiency, facets such as ethical methods used to approach success, and the efforts involved in pursuing success should also be valued to make the final judgment whether someone is successful or not..
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 62
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 62
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
.... In the meantime of approaching goals, many might encounter other findings that are also ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun biochemistry seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much biochemistry', 'a good deal of biochemistry'.
Suggestion: much biochemistry; a good deal of biochemistry
...nd are valued successful. For instance, many biochemistry research ended up with unexpected resul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun share seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many shares'.
Suggestion: Many shares
... a factor to access one's success. Many share the same goals. Some might make them wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es were still building their spaceship. Besides achievement, human beings also c...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'athletes'' or 'athlete's'?
Suggestion: athletes'; athlete's
...ng issue of drug-abuse to enhancing the athletes performance. For example, it has been p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ent whether someone is successful or not..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2408.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21212121212 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74748914714 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6614047592 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1851851852 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.62962962963 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146899578015 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443071325182 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420787956037 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924444907482 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386134888009 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.