The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads.
Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Travelling, undoubtedly, is an essential part of life and no one can avoid it by staying on a place. However, it is always argued that the number of vehicles is rapidly increasing as compared to the past and other means of transportation are needed with global laws to reduce the private vehicles and the usage. I tend to agree partly with this very notion.
In the first place, public transport should be encouraged as it is need of the hour. It provides flexible and convenient timings to job and school going persons because they manage their times according to the customers. In this way, majority of the public may be covered.Also there would be least rush on roads as compared to the situation when everyone owing their cars. Thus, this is pertinent to mention that the local transport is very necessary and provides good substitute to the private cars.
In addition to the previous point, the massive purchase of cars is causing serious environmental problems because when everyone is using their own cars, it will generate critical pollution substance. Since global warming is becoming major issue round the globe and these cars are polluting the whole environment as well as damaging ozone layer. The whole issue arise due to the practice of having own car and using for the whole society. For instance, In British only the increase in number of cars and their use was 290 lac in 2000 from the very first day of its use. Thus, there is no denying the fact that the extensive use of private cars is producing alarming situation to the environment and should be controlled by introducing common laws to minimize the number of vehicles.
Nevertheless, there is emergency use of the transport and people cannot wait for the public transport in their instant meeting calls as well as emergency health problems and they need the remote access to the desired location. In this way, they can easily tackle the whole situation. Therefore, the laws to maintain own cars should be relaxing in order to handle any situation.
To recapitulate, it is a good idea to control the number of own cars by making common rules as they are creating problems for the whole society but the rules should be decided by keeping in mind the whole population and their needs in mind and making other means of travelling more user friendly and comfortable.
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
..., majority of the public may be covered.Also there would be least rush on roads as c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
..., majority of the public may be covered.Also there would be least rush on roads as c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the least'.
Suggestion: be the least
... public may be covered.Also there would be least rush on roads as compared to the situat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83830845771 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60122416741 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495024875622 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8953010009 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5625 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247455309666 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795186888777 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706720350235 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122642735406 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562692402376 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.