pto 14
The material discussea the concept of dealing with forest fires by salvage logging. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely cleaning up the forest after fires could create right condition for trees' growth. Next, removing the dead trees could reduce insects population that may damage live trees. Finally, salavage logging has an economic benefits and could create new jobs opportunities.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is rapid removing of dead trees could lake nuterients that could be necessary for the live trees growth. In addition to that, dead trees could increase the growth of some barck betttle; however it could increase the growth of other birds and icnsects that contribute to healthy forests. One final point, salvage logging does not has any economic benefits; given that it is done by using helicopters which is very expensive. Furthermore, creating jobs for local society will be temproray, and fill by outside workers becaue local residents are not trained enough.
In summary there are descripancies in the information presented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | Christine hanna | 3 | view |
- do you agree or disagree the young kids are impolite or unkind than yey were fifty years ago? 80
- tpo 54 3
- do you agree or disagree? people benefit more from traveling in their own countries than traveling to foreign countries? 73
- young people today could not help their communities as they were in the past 76
- do you agree or disagree? people, who have few friends stable for a long time are happier than people who can make new friends easily? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could create new jobs opportunities. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...ts that could be necessary for the live trees growth. In addition to that, dead trees...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of some barck betttle; however it could increase the growth of other birds and i...
^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: have
...e final point, salvage logging does not has any economic benefits; given that it is...
^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...e final point, salvage logging does not has any economic benefits; given that it is...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al residents are not trained enough. In summary there are descripancies in th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56476683938 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65082500453 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637305699482 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2898205646 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.