Many children these days have their own mobile phones. What are advantages and disadvantages? Give your own opinion.
Nowadays, we see an expanding number of youngsters conveying cell phones. These devices that were before an extravagance for youngsters are turning into a need for more youthful kids. One motivation to this is the reasonableness of cell phones nowadays. An increasingly critical reason is the worry of guardians over the risk and multifaceted nature of the advanced world.
Cell phones were intended to improve and break the confinements of correspondence. As populace, traffic, and different complexities in the public eye increments, there are worries over wellbeing of youngsters. This is credited to the trouble of correspondence among youngsters and guardians. Gone were where kids could travel unreservedly without stressing their folks. Subsequently, guardians resort to giving their youngsters cell phones. This comforts their mind realizing that their kids will be contactable regardless of crisis.
Be that as it may, there are individuals scrutinizing the adequacy of cell phones on checking risk. Schools are commonly ok for kids and have payphones accessible when pressing correspondence is required. Besides, enabling youngsters to convey costly devices may in truth make them defenseless against risk. A few guardians may likewise underestimate the simplicity of correspondence by permitting their kids an excess of opportunity. Little youngsters shouldn't be permitted to go without the supervision of grown-ups, be it educators or guardians. Giving them a cell phone doesn't make them increasingly secured.
To whole up, I do see the advantages of giving kids cell phones, yet I don't concur that it is a flat out need. The emphasis ought to be on bringing up wellbeing mindfulness among kids through instruction. They ought to likewise be furnished with adequate security and supervision. This are immediate strategies that ought to be taken to make a sheltered domain for youngsters, rather than over-dependence on cell phones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | gurmeet6789 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | Tinatintin | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Nammu92 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 454, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...xcess of opportunity. Little youngsters shouldnt be permitted to go without the supervis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 575, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... or guardians. Giving them a cell phone doesnt make them increasingly secured. T...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 72, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tages of giving kids cell phones, yet I dont concur that it is a flat out need. The ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 282, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[3]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...with adequate security and supervision. This are immediate strategies that ought to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, likewise, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57382550336 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28635898806 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573825503356 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4090518239 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.05 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 7.06120827912 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.085234694072 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280557427601 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383533979124 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545646964914 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226337987357 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.