When it comes to the source of odd sounds detected by Russian submarines from 1960s to 1980s, the speaker completely refutes the information from the reading material.
Initially, the author claims that the strange noises derived from the call of orca whales attracting a mate, which is similar to the sounds that the submarines found. However, the lecturer holds an opposite view. To be specific, it is known to us that orca whales live in the surface of ocean instead of deep sea where submarines usually sail. Evidently, those noises detected by those Russia submarines in the deep sea could not be the voice of Orcas who muttered on the surface.
In addition, in the passage, giant squid was brought under suspicion for the reason that they might emit some sound and even approach the submarines. The professor, nevertheless, argues against this viewpoint. To elaborate, the hazard occurred during only ten years, whereas if there are giant squid in that area, the noise would not disappear in ten years because they hardly migrate where they live for many years. As a result, the sound would continue for decades, which conflicts with the theory stated by the author.
Lastly, the writer professes that the sound was made by other submarines that were secretly patrolling in the deep sea. But from the listening, we know that direction of a submarine cannot change fast and acutely. While the sonar suggested that this object could divert its direction easily. Moreover, the engine of submarines are always accompanied with tremendous noise, which, as a matter of fact, these Russia submarines did not find at that time. So it is self-evident that this state made by the author is totally wrong.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Monster_Miu | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bmarine cannot change fast and acutely. While the sonar suggested that this object co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in addition, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47995388339 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0510558493 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2307692308 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117665407548 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394572239688 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422274997725 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076733142195 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365785497209 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.