Nowadays the burden of responsibilities taken by children in some parts of the world is less as of the previous generation. While some argue that it is a negative change, however, I believe that it has positively impacted our society because of concentration on education and learning of family values.
Undoubtedly, there are several benefits of sharing responsibilities. Most important of them is that the children learn about the value of money. For example, teenagers who work part-time are getting familiar with the hardship of earning money. By doing so, they are sharing the responsibility of their parents by either paying for the books or part of school fees. Therefore, by working offspring's can share the burden of their parents in purchasing stationery or in paying the school fee.
Nevertheless, children having few responsibilities outweigh the children with more of it. Firstly, they can fully concentrate on their education. The children who work part-time often get tired and cannot able to complete their homework or doze off in classroom, as a result, they lack behind in education as compared to the ones who are not working. Secondly, the dropout rate of kids from schools who are working more than the ones who are not. Additionally, a recent survey published by the Save Children in Pakistan has given alarming figures of kids were not completing the education. According to it, approximately 70 percent of the children who works leave school before graduation because of financially supporting the family.
Furthermore, the countries where kids share fewer responsibilities are spending more time with their families. Since they only go to school, therefore, they spend most of the time at home either completing homework or playing with their siblings. For instance, I used to spend my free time while playing with my younger brother and helping my mother in doing house chores. Therefore, kids learn family values which ultimately has a positive impact on society.
In conclusion, although children learn the value of money while sharing responsibilities, however they cannot able to concentrate on their studies and not only dropout from school but also spend less time with their families. Therefore, I believe that it has not a positive impact on society.
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'. How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 73
- You would like to buy some electrical goods at a shop in a town which is far from your home.Write a letter to the manager of the shop. In your letter:say which electrical goods you wantask questions about the cost of the goods and how to payexplain how yo 56
- Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems.Others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future Do you think this is a positive or negative development 81
- In some cultures people give more value to old people while in other cultures people give more value to young people. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...dren in some parts of the world is less as of the previous generation. While some ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24184782609 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00023505498 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502717391304 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.697196055 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.526315789 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158756441597 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556911195406 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065627402289 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1088491563 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857508784718 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.