workers who do several tasks doing the workdays are more satisfied than those who do similar tasks all day long?
Since the beginning of the current century, turning over rates have been changed drastically. Given that people got bored with their jobs, they left them searching for new opportunities. Some people believe that workers would be more satisfied if they do similar tasks during their workday; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts on this belief. From a personal perspective, works should do several roles in their jobs; in order to ameliorate their responsibilities, productivity and experience. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more detail.
The first and foremost point, provided that workers involved in a variety of tasks, they could improve their productivity. A recent survey conducted by Oxford University found that companies that gave their employees the chance to do many roles could achieve considerable economic success. Furthermore, doing a variety of work responsibilities not only could amplify workers’ experience; but also, their mental well-being. Consequently, having many tasks during the workday is imperative.
Next, coupled with productivity, experience is another benefit of involving in many tasks. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is big companies, such as Costco and Walmart let customer serves employees do plenty of roles, such as purchasing items, returning items and solving customers’ problems. Likewise, carrying out different tasks could promote workers’ experience and multitasks skill. Therefore, doing a variety of roles has a striking impact on workers’ personalities.
Ultimately, having many work-related activities could enhance employees’ responsibility. For instance, pharmacists who do several tasks during their workdays, such as answering phone calls, counseling patients and reviewing prescriptions could augment their ability to manage the flow of the work in the pharmacy. Although doing multitasks put workers under severe pressure, it could cement their skills and help them to get better jobs with better wages. As a result, having multitasks skill is crucial for employees to pull up their futures with a lot of thrives and prosperity.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, workers who do different tasks during the workdays are more satisfied than those who do similar tasks along the day. It is suggested that companies design new programs that could help their employees to enhance multitasks skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Christine hanna | 81 | view |
- do you agree or disagree? teachers should not make their political or social views known in the classrooms? 83
- parent today do not have enough time to spend with their kids it is better to spend that time playing=g games or sprots with their kids , other people believe that they should spend time doing things related to schoolwork? 60
- tpo 54 3
- In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure and successful future? do you agree or disagree? 90
- some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade the get in school. do you think this is a good idea? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ployees to enhance multitasks skills.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68533333333 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12743956332 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605333333333 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.079161711 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.210526316 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334075901154 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103348169833 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145883906132 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222757874147 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142280158758 0.0645574589148 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.