Children nurturing has attracted much social concern. Some parents reward their children with money when they get high marks at school. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement with this action.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is personal enjoyment. The fact is that offering children money for every high score creates a chance for them to be provided with a huge amount of exciting feelings. Therefore, it is possible for them to have more motivation in studying and put more effort into their academic tasks. As a result, children have a tendency to fill the gaps in their abilities and gradually sharpen their existed skills. Consequently, this plays a crucial role in stimulating the increase of their satisfaction. More importantly, receiving money for high scores possesses a large probability for children to have appreciated feelings for their own labor. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for them to gradually be aware of the reward of dedication and the consequence of laziness. On that ground, needless to say, it is expected to encourage children to acknowledge which thing is needed to do and obtain more mature thinking for every aspect of life. Subsequently, they are more likely to harvest a lot of success in their future careers and eventually be filled with gratification. By and large, giving children money for their high academic records greatly promotes happiness in their life.
On the other hand, some people might say that with the money received, children can spend them ineffectively for not valuable purposes such as games, and be too captivated with them. Accordingly, their academic performance will be extremely declined. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that parents always can confine their children's spending by teaching them the way to use money suitably. It follows that they are always able to put everything under control. Furthermore, using money as a reward for high scores stands a golden chance for children to have an income for themselves. In this case, they bound to buy what they need for studying, playing and satisfy their hobbies. Correspondingly, it is apparent that children are inclined to be pleased and have their brain relaxed. This helps them obtain a creative mind and possibly generate great ideas in studying. As a consequence, children are certain to grow into a more competent person and have their academic record greatly improved. Beyond any doubt, the idea that giving children money for their high marks at school extremely decline their study productivity is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to have a good decision on choosing the way of nurturing the children.
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1186440678 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82790654793 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514830508475 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1164806534 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9230769231 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65384615385 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32173379308 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897807210969 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797397262942 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202620081544 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792685460012 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.